Fairfax General Rule Reckless Driving Charges

In Fairfax, reckless driving at excessive speed is punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and a six-month prison sentence.

It is important to examine the facts underlying the indictment thoroughly and to find the most effective way to fight them in court. The consequences of a conviction are incredibly serious, so it is important to consult a lawyer in the face of these allegations, because reckless driving is a criminal offence. If the facts are bad and it is not possible to reduce the charge, unscrupulous Fairfax lawyers will negotiate such a manageable sentence for the defendant. Officers can summon a driver if they believe his driving is dangerous but does not fall into a specific category of “reckless driving.”

In court, the officer must prove that the ride was so dangerous that it endangered life, body or property. Issuing the quote is the easy part, but proving it is a real challenge, and officers undoubtedly need to do so.

The evidence will depend on the facts of the case, and sometimes that can make it difficult for officials to prove a case. The general rule for reckless driving is much broader than other reckless driving, but it provides some reasonable guidelines for drivers, as well as some exceptions to the rule.

In Fairfax, reckless driving is generally a very broad category, and the underlying behavior goes pretty far. However, for the accused conduct, the officer must provide evidence which unequivocally proves that such conduct took place and is the fault of the accused. This evidence may only be the opinion of an officer, but without more substantial evidence it is very unlikely to lead to a conviction. An unscrupulous lawyer at the wheel can help a defendant determine whether there is enough evidence to convict him, or he can also derive an alternative explanation for his conduct from the officers “claims.

Reckless driving is a serious offence in the sense of CDL, and one can behave in a way that can cause serious harm to oneself, others and the environment.

Two convictions within three years usually result in a 60-day driving disqualification and a two-year driving disqualification within two years of the first offence of up to 120 days – without disqualification. Two convictions in three or more years, which normally resulted in 60 days of driving disqualification, or three in four years resulted in 120 days of driving disqualification.

This means that CDL holders will not be able to drive their commercial vehicles during the period of their disqualification, which is a major concern for commercial drivers facing charges, as disqualification could mean not only the loss of their licence, but also of their job. Although it is the most comprehensive form of reckless driving, lawyers must examine the case law to determine whether the conduct of the officer accused in court was ever “reckless driving.” If the conduct has not already been brought to trial as “reckless driving” and there is no case law to support it, then the lawyer cannot argue much more. The ruthless Fairfax driver’s lawyer can explain to the defendant what the officers need to prove in court and analyze the facts to find the best strategy to prevent a conviction and mitigate the consequences. If there is already case law against the conduct, the lawyer can use it to the advantage of the accused by comparing and contrasting it with what has emerged in the present case.